Map the current process
Users, steps, delays, errors, duplicate work and the evidence already available.
Independent guidance for owners and managers replacing spreadsheets, planning portals, specifying SaaS products or taking control of a legacy system.
A useful specification describes decisions, exceptions and ownership — not just a list of attractive screens.
Users, steps, delays, errors, duplicate work and the evidence already available.
Define what the first release must improve and what remains outside it.
Permissions, statuses, data, integrations, failures and fallback actions.
Repositories, cloud accounts, documentation, testing and sign-off.
Monitoring, support, updates, backups, security and future change.
Each route has different risks, data flows and maintenance needs.
Accounts, documents, requests, messages, payments and audit history.
∞Value, onboarding, roles, billing, analytics and the operating model.
⌘CRM, workflow, internal tools and the choice between ready-made and custom.
⇄What moves between systems, when it moves and what happens when it fails.
↺Code, servers, databases, domains, keys, pipelines and missing documentation.
◇Authentication, permissions, updates, backups, monitoring and incident readiness.
This tool highlights planning effort. It is not a quotation and does not recommend a supplier.
Clear enough for a business owner, detailed enough to improve a conversation with a technical team.
Use data, roles, workflows and ongoing operations to decide which kind of project you are actually planning.
Open the guide →A method based on roles, workflows, integrations, data and uncertainty.
Processes, exceptions, acceptance and ownership — not only features.
Repositories, licenses, infrastructure, keys and practical access.
Compare criticality, tests, data, team knowledge and migration risk.
The site is an independent guide, not the previous company and not a hidden development agency.
Cost content explains drivers and uncertainty rather than pretending a brief is unnecessary.
Security is described to help owners reduce risk, not to enable attacks.
No invented clients, portfolios or “case studies”. Hypothetical examples are marked.
The process and business need come before a preferred framework.